Proposed resolution – A Sustained Faculty Commitment to Preventing Sexual Violence
Posted: October 24, 2026
Sponsor: University Faculty Committee
Resolution:
Whereas sexual assault inflicts lasting harm on members of our community, and its persistence
at Cornell constitutes a pressing crisis;
Whereas the scourge of sexual violence undermines our students’ ability to learn and faculty
members’ ability to teach, striking at the heart of the University’s educational mission;
Whereas survivors, students, and members of the wider community have called on Cornell
faculty to take sustained action to confront this crisis with the seriousness it demands;
Whereas Cornell educates leaders of the coming generation, and how the University meets this
moment can demonstrate what a community owes to each of its members;
Whereas healing from sexual violence and rebuilding trust within the Cornell community will
take time and require sustained opportunities for members to be heard, reflect together, and
help shape the University’s response;
Whereas the Faculty Senate’s response to this crisis should draw on the faculty’s capacity for
rigorous inquiry, reasoned deliberation, and independent judgment to help all members of the
Cornell community learn, teach, and work free from sexual violence;
Be it therefore resolved that the Senate recommends that the University establish a standing,
faculty-led research center focused on sexual violence and its prevention, beginning work no
later than the Fall 2027 semester with adequate funding for at least five years. It should be free
to publish its findings and should report regularly to the Faculty Senate and the Cornell
community.
Be it further resolved that the Faculty Senate shall invite the Student Assembly, Graduate and
Professional Student Assembly, Employee Assembly, and University Assembly to co-convene a
Joint Commission on Sexual Violence, composed of members appointed by each participating
body. This Commission should build upon and extend the work of the Sexual Assault Task
Force by engaging with the Cornell community in an ongoing dialogue aimed at identifying
strategies for reducing rates of sexual misconduct on campus, evaluating the effectiveness of
approaches that have been implemented, improving university systems to support survivors and
respond to sexual assault, and fostering a vibrant social life free of sexual violence. The
Commission shall make recommendations in support of shared governance for consideration by
the various assemblies. The central administration shall provide adequate staffing and support
for the Commission to conduct its work.
Be it further resolved that the Faculty Senate shall establish a standing Faculty Committee on
Institutional Administration, composed of faculty appointed by the Nominations and Elections
Committee with the concurrence of the Faculty Senate. The Committee shall review the effects
of administrative policies and procedures, and provide the Senate with analysis,
recommendations, and constructive criticism in support of shared governance. The committee
will be empowered to evaluate, assess, and make proposals to enact positive change in our
administrative policies and procedures for Senate consideration.
The Committee’s initial focus shall be on the University’s response to sexual violence, including:
• Implementation of the measures announced October 13, 2026;
• The University’s response to the recommendations of the Sexual Assault Task Force
and the Joint Commission, as well as to the findings and recommendations of the
independent review led by Sally Yates;
• The review of Greek life, including criteria for whether, and under what conditions,
suspended fraternity social activities may resume;
• Staffing and budgets for prevention and survivor support; and
• University investments in healthy spaces for student extracurricular activities, including
ongoing planning for Collegetown’s revitalization.
The Committee shall report regularly to the Faculty Senate.
Be it further resolved that the three entities established above, individually providing state of the
art comparative national research, local engaged understanding, and considered judgement,
shall work together to provide an integrated framework for addressing sexual assault on
campus.
2 thoughts on "Proposed resolution – A Sustained Faculty Commitment to Preventing Sexual Violence"
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
While I like the concept of the concept of this Joint commission, I have a friendly amendment to suggest, motivated in part by Cornell’s history. I suggest that the joint commission be organized and run by the University Assembly (UA). The charter and mission of the UA is to integrate the concerns and desires of the constituent assemblies, which all contribute members to the UA at parity. It was originally set up in response to the demand for improved shared governance in the 1960s and 1970s. Some may recall that the authority over the Code of Conduct and consent in the hiring of the OSCCS director (key features of UA relevance in shared governance) was removed from the UA and placed inside the VP of Campus Life office in 2020. Subsequent revisions to the Code and its implementation procedures were then carried out without UA’s voice or approval. This is not, in my opinion, the execution of shared governance where each branch relies on each other and negotiates with power and stakes in the outcomes. The campus climate suffers from this lack of agency, and there is now no one else to hold responsible for the policies other than the “central administration”. Further, the administration is able to fill its policy committees with targeted individuals from constituent assemblies, bypassing the ideal function of the UA, and claim full campus participation even if the rest of the campus is a minority of the committee. If the constituent assemblies were instead to agree ourselves to use the UA as the vehicle for joint commissions and matters that are crosscutting, we can restore some of the shared governance architecture that was previously envisioned and was highly productive for 40+ years of campus vitality.
Jonathan Butcher
Cornell Duffield Engineering
I want to note that while several faculty who have voiced opposition to the phrase “Central Administration” in the other resolution now before the Senate (the no confidence one), that phrase is being used here, presumably without objection. If the UFC understands what “Central Administration” means, it seems to me that its definition is widely accepted, and not vague as some in opposition to the no confidence vote have asserted.
For the record, I’m agnostic. I don’t love the phrase but I can live with it. I think there are perhaps better ways to name the structures to which we wish to speak, but if the UFC has a definition of “Central Administration,” I would call on the sponsors to say what they mean so that everyone is clear on both motions before the Senate.
Alex Nading
Anthropology