Skip to main content

Cornell University

Office of the Dean of Faculty

Connecting & Empowering Faculty

RTE Working Group

Senior Lecturer
Bowers CIS
Computer Science

Senior Lecturer
Sibley School of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
Co-chair

Senior Extension Associate
SC Johnson College of Business

Research Associate Sr.
Arts & Sciences
Chemistry & Chemical Biology

Professor of the Practice
CALS
Applied Economics & Management

Clinical Professor of Law
Law School

Lecturer
CALS
Landscape Architecture

Senior Extension Associate
ILR School
Worker Institute

Lecturer
CALS
Animal Science

Senior Extension Associate
Human Ecology
Brofenbrenner Center
Co-chair

Associate Librarian
University Library

Senior Research Associate
Veterinary Medicine
Molecular Medicine

Senior Lecturer
Bowers CIS
Information Science

Associate Professor of the Practice
AAP
City & Regional Planning

Dean of Faculty
Human Ecology
Psychology


About

“RTE” is an acronym for “Research Teaching Extension” and during 2018-19 steps were taken to enhance the shared governance role for RTE faculty. Here is a synopsis of that work which culminated in the passage of Resolution 131.

As a natural follow-up, in Fall 2019 an ad hoc committee was convened and charged by the Faculty Senate to examine the totality of the academic environment that relates to the RTE faculty and to propose improvements.

The work of the committee was essentially put on hold during the S20, F20, S21, and F21 semesters because of the pandemic although its work on emeritus status for certain retiring RTE titleholders was approved by the Senate (Resolution 141) and is now implemented, as seen in 5.5 of the Faculty Handbook.

Formation

Was convened at the end of F21 to resume unfinished business of the ad hoc committee’s work.

“Title Clarity” Across Existing Policies

Across all policies we have to make sure that every reference that is made to “faculty” is intended and precise. “University Faculty”, “tenure track faculty”, “faculty with tenure”, “professorial faculty”, “RTE faculty”, and “visiting faculty” identify different subsets of “the faculty”. This Faculty Terminology Guide outlines the different ways we use the word. Ambiguity in a policy or guideline document typically creates time-wasting misunderstandings and angst.

The Faculty Handbook, the Cornell Policy Library, the Campus Code of Conduct, the Senate Bylaws, the University Assembly Charter, the Code of Legislation for the Graduate  School, as well as numerous policies that are maintained by the Center for Teaching Innovation, the Research Office and the Office of Human Resources need to be reviewed with this consideration in mind.

Enhanced RTE Title Write-Ups

Academic HR maintains a document of approved academic titles, their modifiers and descriptions for RTE titles as well as Tenure Track titles. They include the actual title description and various notes that relate to its administration, e.g., renewal, promotion, etc.

The Lecturer, Research Associate, and Extension Associate Tracks

The lecturer trackresearch associate track, and extension associate track pages offer side-by-side comparisons between the prose that is in the current title write-up and the prose that would be in the proposed “enhanced” write-up. We spent most of our time thinking about these titles which involve about 900 colleagues.

The RTE Professorial Titles

The colleges follow “enabling legislation” guidelines and implement their own Senate-approved version of clinical professorprofessor of the practice, and research professor. Modifications to these university-level title write-ups are minimal; we have basically just added links to the college implementations which is where you should go for detail.

Other RTE Titles (title descriptions and qualifications can be found on the Academic HR website in the approved academic titles document)

Only minor modifications have been made to the research scientist, principal research scientist, senior scholar, and senior scientist title descriptions, e.g., substituting “RTE” for “nontenure track”, mentioning “University Voting Rights”, etc. These titles have been replaced by the research professor title.

Similarly, very minor modifications have been made to the instructor, teaching associate, visiting critic, visiting fellow, visiting scholar, visiting scientist, librarian, and archivist title write-ups. The committee has only indirect knowledge of these positions and would much prefer to be guided in their editing by individuals who have first hand experience with these important titles.

Matters that Have Long-Term Importance

Some specific topics that require attention:

  • Is a RTE Standing committee necessary and if so, how should it be organized?
  • Need to clarify RTE membership rules for the standing committees of the Senate.
  • Profile of RTE Faculty in the Colleges Free speech. The climate for RTE Faculty in departments and colleges.
  • Professional Development Leaves and other mechanisms that can promote excellence.

RTE Standing Committee

A Standing Committee on RTE Topics

There are two possibilities.

Have Separate Committee

Create  a standing committee of the Senate called the “Committee on the Professional Status of the RTE Faculty.” It would consist of ten RTE members reasonably distributed across the colleges and across the three RTE faculties. Two of the seats would be reserved for RTE faculty who do not have voting rights. The Dean and Associate Dean of Faculty would be ex officio members.

This Committee would be charged to consider aspects of RTE titles that relate to free speech, hiring, promotion, professional development, and retention. It would continually monitor how the different colleges are using RTE faculty and how the University and RTE faculties interact. It would develop criteria procedures for awarding emeritus/a status for those who retire from certain RTE titles.

The idea would be to have an RTE version of the Academic Freedom and the Professional Status of the Faculty Committee. Here is some prose from that Senate Committee’s charge:

Examine and make recommendations concerning issues and considerations in the following areas:

Academic Freedom and Responsibility.

Freedom of Teaching and Learning, including but not limited to the special concerns of the faculty that teaching and learning at Cornell University be carried on freely and without disruption, interference, or intimidation.

The Professional Status of the Faculty, including but not limited to policies and procedures relating to faculty appointments, promotion, retirement, separation, tenure and other related matters.

Modify the AFPSF To Include RTE Oversight

This Committee would be charged to consider faculty issues that relate to free speech, hiring, promotion, professional development, retention, use of titles, retirement, reappointment, and tenure.

There are several advantages to having a single committee. It is consistent with the idea that the University and RTE faculties have interlocking futures and that major problems should be addressed jointly by both types of faculty. It also would make the University Faculty more aware of the concerns of the RTE faculty and vice versa. Two committees would create communication/liaison inefficiencies and promote thinking in isolation.

Regarding membership, here are the current rules for AFPSF committee:

Nine members of the faculty appointed with the concurrence of the Faculty Senate by the Nominations and Elections Committee for three‐year terms.

Two student members (of which at least one shall be an undergraduate) with voting privileges, selected annually by the Staffing Committee of the Student Assembly. Reselection of a student for a second year shall be permitted. Student members of the Committee shall not participate in the review process set forth in Subdivision B, C, D and E of the Committee’s Charge.

To ensure a proper mix of University and RTE faculty this could be modified to something like this:

Nine members of the University Faculty and up to six members of the voting RTE faculty with the concurrence of the Faculty Senate by the Nominations and Elections Committee for three‐year terms.

Profile of RTE Faculty in Colleges

Article XIV in the University Bylaws leaves the aspects of NTT representation (a.k.a. voting rights) up to the individual colleges.

[Table showing the rules for each college]

The University Bylaws also has a paragraph on hiring, indicating that clinical professors, professors-of-the-practice, and lecturers should participate in the hiring “of their own kind”.

Documents and Resources

The Faculty Handbook defines both titles and title modifiers. Modifiers include “visiting”, “adjunct”, “courtesy”, “acting”, and “emeritus/a”.

The 2004 Report on the Status of Nontenure Track Faculty

An ad hoc committee of the Senate looked into NTT (RTE) matters back in 2004 and they produced this report. To permit direct access to specific parts of the report, we created an online version with internal links.

Senate Resolution 44 (on professional development opportunities) and Senate Resolution 45 (on Emeritus/a status for NTT (RTE) faculty) were the only Senate outcomes associated with the report.

Cornell Docs

Professorial Title Legislation

The titles of Professor-of-the-Practice, Research Professor, Clinical Professor and Teaching Professor were established by the colleges under the umbrella of enabling legislation passed by the Faculty Senate. Below is a complete legislative history of these titles.

Length of Appointment and Renewability

Clinical ProfessorUp to 5 years and renewable repeatedly.
Professor-of-the-Practice “Long term”
Research ProfessorTerms of positions bearing these titles shall normally be up to five years. Unless otherwise specified, they shall be renewable indefinitely
Senior Extension AssociateUp to 5 years and renewable.
Extension AssociateUp to 3 years and renewable.
Senior Research AssociateUp to 5 years and renewable.
Research AssociateUp to 3 years and renewable
Research Scientist and Senior ScientistUp to 5 years and renewable. Reappointments require approval by the provost, upon recommendation by the department chair and the dean.
Senior LecturerUp to 5 years and renewable.
LecturerUp to 3 years and renewable.
Librarian
Archivist
Teaching AssociateAppointments as teaching associate can be for up to one year and are renewable. This title is not in the promotional sequence for lecturer/senior lecturer.
InstructorInstructors may be appointed for a term not to exceed two years for a maximum period of service of five academic years.
Post-DocsPostdoctoral appointments are made for terms of up to one year and may be renewed annually, normally not renewable beyond five years.
Visiting FellowAppointments of visiting fellows may be for as little as several weeks or up to one year; these appointments are renewable, but the total time spent as visiting fellow cannot exceed three years, irrespective of departmental affiliations.
Visiting CriticFor as little as several weeks or up to one year, renewable up to a total of three years, irrespective of departmental affiliation
Visiting Scholar/ScientistFor as little as several weeks or up to one year, renewable up to a total of three years, irrespective of departmental affiliation.
AdjunctAdjunct professors or adjunct associate professors may be appointed for renewable terms of not to exceed five years each. Adjunct assistant professors may be appointed for renewable terms of not to exceed three years each.”
CourtesyUp to five year appointments.
ActingNormally one year. Renewal requires special circumstances.
VisitingNormally one year. Can be renewed twice.

Promotion within Track Rules

Clinical Professor TrackDecisions about appointment and promotion are made on the authority of the dean; approval by the provost or the Board of Trustees is not necessary. The titles “clinical professor,” “associate clinical professor,” and “assistant clinical professor” are available in a given college only upon satisfaction of a special approval process specified in the University Faculty’s enabling legislation.
Professor of the Practice TrackPromotion within the professor of the practice ranks is possible, and promotion guidelines are comparable in rigor and process to those for tenure-track faculty. For detailed information about this title, see college-specific legislation available in
Research Professor TrackPromotions to the associate and full professor ranks, as well as reappointment at any rank at the end of a fixed term, should follow procedures used for tenure-track faculty.

A dossier-based review must be conducted for initial appointment. Through an exception approved by the department chair and the dean, the dossier-based review may be conducted during the first year, with continued appointment contingent on successful review. This dossier shall typically include letters from confidential external referees, letters from participants in current or recent research programs, a report of the faculty vote, and an analytical recommendation by the department chair to the dean, who makes the ultimate decision about appointment.

Extension Associate TrackPromotion to the rank of senior extension associate is not automatic, but may be undertaken when a senior position becomes necessary or available and when an extension associate has demonstrated high levels of ability, independence, originality, and productivity. Promotions are based on the candidate’s past performance, prominence in the field, and ability to anticipate future programming needs. A formal review is required for promotion to senior extension associate.
Research Associate TrackTo initiate a promotion review, the head of the research program asks the candidate to supply a personal statement of past research accomplishments and future goals together with a curriculum vitae that includes publications, honors and awards, service to professional organizations, and other relevant professional activities. These materials must accompany a covering letter from the head of the research program to the chair or director. The letter should address the candidate’s performance, contributions to scholarship, and standing in the field. The department chair or the director solicits letters of recommendation from known experts (at Cornell and/or elsewhere) who provide candid, confidential assessments of the candidate’s achievements. The chair or director then forwards the dossier and makes a written recommendation, either positive or negative, to the dean or the vice provost for research for final disposition.
Principal Research Scientist and Research ScientistAn individual may be appointed directly to the principal research scientist title or promoted from research scientist. The line of progression in these titles is limited to research scientist and principal research scientist – there is no routine expectation of promotion from senior research associate. There is no routine expectation of promotion from these titles to senior scientist. Promotion from research scientist to principal research scientist is based on quality of achievement, productivity, national and international stature in the field, leadership of the independent research program, effectiveness with colleagues and with participants in the research program, and service to the field. Promotion is not automatic, for example after a particular number of years in title. A formal dossier review is required for promotion to principal research scientist and follows the procedures for the dossier-based appointment review.
Lecturer trackPromotion to senior lecturer is based on excellence in teaching and pedagogy. Such excellence may be shown in classroom teaching; contributions to the design, syllabi, and organization of departmental course offerings; and applications or development of pedagogy in the field. Contributions to pedagogical advances will vary from field to field, and may be demonstrated by, but not limited to, developing independent or team-taught courses, creating teaching materials and methodologies, training and supervising other lecturers, or holding administrative or supervisory responsibilities for course offerings.

The dean is responsible for determining appropriate qualifications for senior lecturers and lecturers; those qualifications may vary by subfield or department. Senior lecturers may be hired at that rank if they have appropriate qualifications and experience; they also may be promoted to that rank, typically after six years of service as lecturer.

Professorial Title Legislation

Enabling Legislation for Teaching Professor (Res 195, April 2024)

Enabling Legislation for Research Professor (Res 109, May 2015)

CVM (Res 118, April 2016)
CHE (Res 119, May  2016))
CALS  (Res 120, Sept 2016)
ENG (Res 122, Nov 2016)
CAS (Res 132, Apr 2019)
ILR (Res 175, Oct 2021)

Enabling Legislation for Professor-of-the-Practice (Res 102, April 2014)

JGSM (Res 103, Feb 2015)
CHE (Res 104 , Feb 2015)
ENG (Res 106, Apr 2015)
LAW (Res 108, May 2015)
CALS (Res 111, Sept 2015)
AAP (Res 114, Feb 2015)
CAS (Res 116, Feb 2016)
ILR (Res 176, Oct 2021)

Enabling Legislation for Clinical Professor (Res 30, May 2002)

LAW (Res 46, May 2005)
JGSM (Res 89, Dec 2010)
CVM (Res 91, Dec 2011)
SHA (Res 100, Aug 2013)
CHE (Res 104 , Feb 2015)

 

Graduate Student Advising

Graduate Student Advising Rules

Who can serve on the Special Committee for a PhD student or a Research Masters student? This question is more or less equivalent to “Who can be a member of the Graduate Faculty?” Use the Code of Legislation of the Graduate Faculty for details, below is a summary.


There are three forms of regular membership on the Graduate Faculty: general, division, and minor.

General Membership

General members typically are selected from the voting members of the University faculty—that is, primarily professors, associate professors, and assistant professors with the highest degree in their field and unmodified titles who are resident on the Ithaca, Cornell Tech, or Geneva campus. To be eligible for general membership on the graduate faculty, a University faculty member must be actively engaged in University research and teaching or outreach in an established field of graduate education. A Ph.D. is routinely required, though exceptions may be granted in some cases (See below).

A general member of the graduate faculty may serve as chair or minor subject member of any special committee in any subject which the faculty member represents.

Individuals holding the following titles are also eligible for general membership on the graduate faculty if their responsibilities qualify them:

  • visiting professor, visiting associate professor, and visiting assistant professor
  • research professor, research associate professor, and research assistant professor
  • adjunct professor, adjunct associate professor, and adjunct assistant professor
  • courtesy professor, courtesy associate professor, and courtesy assistant professor
  • graduate faculty member of the Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences
  • instructor holding the degree of Ph.D. on the resident staff at Ithaca or at Cornell Tech
  • senior scholar and senior scientist
  • principal research scientist and research scientist
  • senior research associate holding the degree of Ph.D.

Individuals holding the following titles are not normally general members of the graduate faculty:

  • clinical professor
  • professor of the practice
  • senior lecturer
  • senior extension associate
  • visiting critic
  • tenured or tenure-track professor without the highest degree in the field.

In exceptional circumstances general membership may be granted to individuals in these categories if the individual’s research is comparable at least to that of tenured Cornell associate professors who are general members of the graduate faculty in the same field, and if the individual’s supervision of graduate students is an explicit job responsibility, making membership on special committees appropriate. Senior research associates, senior lecturers, senior extension associates, visiting critics, and tenured or tenure-track professors without the highest degree in their field who were approved for general membership prior to the establishment of this policy retain their membership.

Division Membership

Tenured and tenure-track professors without a Ph.D., clinical professors, professors of the practice, senior lectures, senior extension associates, and visiting critics may be routinely nominated to division membership on the graduate faculty. As division members, they are limited to administering and advising in professional degree programs —in their area, or serving as a minor member for research degrees as below.

Minor Membership

Academic staff members not normally eligible for general membership—including division faculty, clinical professors, professors of the practice, senior lecturers, senior extension associates, and tenured or tenure-track professors without the highest degree for that field—may be nominated to minor membership if their qualifications justify the designation. Graduate faculty members of the Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences and those faculty affiliated with the Tri-Institutional Research Program are eligible for minor membership on the graduate faculty, based on nomination to a field as below.

Minor members of the graduate faculty may serve as minor subject members on any special committee.


Send questions to Senate Committee Coordinator – C.A. Shugarts